Elabora una introducción muy buena con objetivos y materiales y métodos de la siguiente entrada a este blog donde propongo una investigación y estudio internacional entre varias centros de acabe de micos de filología lingüística fonética semiótica del lenguaje humano y todas las lenguas extintas y existentes y luego quisiera que pudieras analizar la mayoría de mapas disponibles online para que puedas buscar estos fonemas fósiles que propongo la partícula y la partícula ar en nombres o tofonímicos de montañas ríos ciudades relacionados con valles montañas mares y lagos en escalas de mapas regionales y locales en los cinco continentes al azar para verificar la probabilidad de ocurrencia de estos fonemas fósiles toponimicos en concordancia con el modelo de esparcimiento de la especie humana desde hace cientos de miles de años desde el gobierno de África hacia el sur y el norte de África hacia Europa hacia Asia hacia Australia y hacia América con sus respectivos años de migración comprobada por favor utiliza suficientes referencias bibliográficas de revistas indexadas del área de Lingüística antropología arqueología y libros clásicos sobrevolución humana para darle fuerza a esta parte de la discusión y resultados y vamos a concluir con que apenas estamos haciendo una prueba superficial de esta metodología porque es imposible que una persona pueda acarrear al estudio en poco tiempo de todo la toponimia del planeta Tierra donde han habido seres humanos.
Arura 1.0: toponymic phonetical fossils in Homo sapiens prehistoric expansion?
Cover and back cover: Mikel de Elguezabal
First edition: <2028
© Mikel Alberto de Elguezabal Méndez, 2028
Fundación LEA, Calle Palmar, D-12, Riberas, 6101 Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela.
Legal deposit:
ISBN: 978-84-617-0672-3
In a Virtuous Earth Collection
Index
Introduction
Aim of this book
Methodology of Arura 1.0
Methodology of Arura 2.0
First Results in Maps & Sheets
First Conclusions
References
Introduction
As a result of our recurrent observations of physical Earth maps during 3 decades, we have discovered some patterns in the toponymy of rivers, mountains, and inhabited lands that could signify a corroboration of the Homo sapiens spread theories from Africa as the first languages developed and left phonetic traces in their land/river naming, and, representing a hypothesis of one rooted first family of languages that derived, as genes did, during the last 60.000 years (Armitage et al., 2011), until reaching some 5,000 living languages in actual times (Kirchner, ) plus the extinct ones.
That protolanguage could start with vocalic sounds derived from guttural naturally occurring voices in first hominids to communicate and name places and objects.
Probably the first sounds of early humans comes from gestures between a mother-child relationship (Falk, 2004) or derived from sounds of pre-Homo humanoid species like australopithecines (Mukhopadhyay, 2009) and founded today in actual hominines which produce speech-like vocalized sounds as in Theropithecus gelada (Bergman, 2013).
The primary vowel sounds for a, e, i, o, u, in Italian, Spanish or English language, for example only, appear, for us, as a core central common dominium among all languages derived from first primitive Homo sapiens emitted sounds to communicate between and within families and clans.
Here, the reader must make an effort in not to think in any particular living language today, to pose these primary vowel sounds we propose as the root human sounds and the subsequent changes and adaptations that occurred during the spreading and isolation/interexchange of the languages of those first humans in their settlement on Africa, Eurasia, Oceania, and Americas lands, accepting this order of colonization given by the fossil and anthropologic evidence.
Each one of the 5000 languages of today's planet Earth could have vowels derivatives sounds from these proto vowels, and we can assume and use the simple classification of open/closed vowels to distinguish two groups and make more basic yet the origin of human first sounds (and then language, later).
But, why in the French language exist up to 16 vowel sounds? We argue on the history of conformation of this (or any other example) language, with the 5 vowels of Latin-based origin, mixed with Germanic and Celtic languages, all of the Indo-European language family, and certainly with borrows from Basque or Euskera a non-Indo-European language (between the Garonne and Ebro rivers in those times), or probably, even from Hebrew or other Semitic language that shared history during the conformation of France as a modern social entity, all that together, encountered in that land during the development of this (more) Romanic language since 121 before Christ.
As the two fossil phonemes we encountered in maps associated with geographic nomenclature of rivers and lands (plus inhabited places near to) that is proposed in this assay, derive from an open vowel (a) and from a closed vowel (u), we can extend the phonemes to the "sister" vowels in each case (a: e) and (u: i, o). But the common sound that took our attention firstly was the consonant r.
The consonants are speech sounds articulated during complete or partial closure of the vocal tract, and here the diversity of consonant sounds among World languages is greater than for vowels, based on the part of the vocal tract contracted, the duration, the force, the velocity of the sound emitted by the individual, the position of the tongue and many others parameters that we are not considering.
"r" seems to be a primitive sound thought to be derived from guttural screams in first primates, hominines and/or hominids, and we have discovered, empirically, a simple pattern associated maybe to designate placemarks or names as the first protolanguages of the first family branches, spread with the first Homo sapiens that colonized Africa and then other continents. These two types of names refer to two of the elements of nature, water places on one side, and earth (land, soil) places in the other.
We have observed, in a deductive way, the worldwide apparent association of the phoneme "ur" with water places, be the source of a river, the river itself, or an inhabited place near a river or sea; the phoneme "ar" is more associated with earth, lands, soil places, be a valley, a plain, a mountain.
In the proposed Challenge we will try to gather the best information that each institution participating could create with the proposed methodology, the maps locating every toponymic with the fossil phonemes we identify as potentially linked to early human spreading, and then we will see if our hypothesis is validated or rejected. We ask for each institution and academic centres of human biology & geography, anthropology, archeology, and for linguistics, philologists, phoneticians, and phonologists. We will use these maps produced by you dear colleagues in a synthesis of many diverse Atlases, being a project of collegiate research that we are proposing to you. If the hypothesis is accepted you could publish your part of the Arura Project in the Journal you might choose.
Aim of this Project (and subsequent book)
Are these patterns mere coincidences, or a clue to reaching the first one-rooted languages, long before the theological Babel Tower dispersion and get backs the evolutionary dispersion of languages?
We are not intending to demonstrate any superiority of any language over any other, no, never. We love the diversity of languages, accepting the task of caring for every human life on Earth solving the different languages (cultures) that drive us apart. We make this little effort to gain more respect for every language, not only mainstream vehicles to commerce and economy but preserving even the last indigenous language and its dialects at any isolated valley or island worldwide.
The final result of this Project , should be to give place to a recognizing movement among all cultures and its beautiful languages, by demonstrating, with another set of proofs, the unity of our unique cultural species, Homo sapiens, regardless of our skin or hair biochemical differences, in parallel to linguistic ones.
Methodology of Arura 1.0
To achieve our objectives we will carry out these actions:
i) Comparing different Physical maps at different scales with names of rivers, mountains, valleys, plains, and villages/cities, of varied origins and times.
ii) Looking out for the extant traces of the phonemes ur and ar associated with the more "indigenous, native or aboriginal" culture of the sector map, with the aid of the trained (in geography, history, human evolution) person, without taking in account the toponymy derived of clearly historic colonization processes.
iii) Using maps of regional and sub-continental scales, showing major toponymy and opening the curiosity of future researchers to carry a suitable methodology for minor scale maps studies of subsequent Arura's articles for this project.
Arura 1.0: toponymic phonetical fossils in Homo sapiens prehistoric expansion?
Cover and back cover: Mikel de Elguezabal
First edition: <2028
© Mikel Alberto de Elguezabal Méndez, 2028
Fundación LEA, Calle Palmar, D-12, Riberas, 6101 Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela.
Legal deposit:
ISBN: 978-84-617-0672-3
In a Virtuous Earth Collection
Index
Introduction
Aim of this book
Methodology of Arura 1.0
Methodology of Arura 2.0
First Results in Maps & Sheets
First Conclusions
References
Introduction
As a result of our recurrent observations of physical Earth maps during 3 decades, we have discovered some patterns in the toponymy of rivers, mountains, and inhabited lands that could signify a corroboration of the Homo sapiens spread theories from Africa as the first languages developed and left phonetic traces in their land/river naming, and, representing a hypothesis of one rooted first family of languages that derived, as genes did, during the last 60.000 years (Armitage et al., 2011), until reaching some 5,000 living languages in actual times (Kirchner, ) plus the extinct ones.
That protolanguage could start with vocalic sounds derived from guttural naturally occurring voices in first hominids to communicate and name places and objects.
Probably the first sounds of early humans comes from gestures between a mother-child relationship (Falk, 2004) or derived from sounds of pre-Homo humanoid species like australopithecines (Mukhopadhyay, 2009) and founded today in actual hominines which produce speech-like vocalized sounds as in Theropithecus gelada (Bergman, 2013).
The primary vowel sounds for a, e, i, o, u, in Italian, Spanish or English language, for example only, appear, for us, as a core central common dominium among all languages derived from first primitive Homo sapiens emitted sounds to communicate between and within families and clans.
Here, the reader must make an effort in not to think in any particular living language today, to pose these primary vowel sounds we propose as the root human sounds and the subsequent changes and adaptations that occurred during the spreading and isolation/interexchange of the languages of those first humans in their settlement on Africa, Eurasia, Oceania, and Americas lands, accepting this order of colonization given by the fossil and anthropologic evidence.
Each one of the 5000 languages of today's planet Earth could have vowels derivatives sounds from these proto vowels, and we can assume and use the simple classification of open/closed vowels to distinguish two groups and make more basic yet the origin of human first sounds (and then language, later).
But, why in the French language exist up to 16 vowel sounds? We argue on the history of conformation of this (or any other example) language, with the 5 vowels of Latin-based origin, mixed with Germanic and Celtic languages, all of the Indo-European language family, and certainly with borrows from Basque or Euskera a non-Indo-European language (between the Garonne and Ebro rivers in those times), or probably, even from Hebrew or other Semitic language that shared history during the conformation of France as a modern social entity, all that together, encountered in that land during the development of this (more) Romanic language since 121 before Christ.
As the two fossil phonemes we encountered in maps associated with geographic nomenclature of rivers and lands (plus inhabited places near to) that is proposed in this assay, derive from an open vowel (a) and from a closed vowel (u), we can extend the phonemes to the "sister" vowels in each case (a: e) and (u: i, o). But the common sound that took our attention firstly was the consonant r.
The consonants are speech sounds articulated during complete or partial closure of the vocal tract, and here the diversity of consonant sounds among World languages is greater than for vowels, based on the part of the vocal tract contracted, the duration, the force, the velocity of the sound emitted by the individual, the position of the tongue and many others parameters that we are not considering.
"r" seems to be a primitive sound thought to be derived from guttural screams in first primates, hominines and/or hominids, and we have discovered, empirically, a simple pattern associated maybe to designate placemarks or names as the first protolanguages of the first family branches, spread with the first Homo sapiens that colonized Africa and then other continents. These two types of names refer to two of the elements of nature, water places on one side, and earth (land, soil) places in the other.
We have observed, in a deductive way, the worldwide apparent association of the phoneme "ur" with water places, be the source of a river, the river itself, or an inhabited place near a river or sea; the phoneme "ar" is more associated with earth, lands, soil places, be a valley, a plain, a mountain.
In the proposed Challenge we will try to gather the best information that each institution participating could create with the proposed methodology, the maps locating every toponymic with the fossil phonemes we identify as potentially linked to early human spreading, and then we will see if our hypothesis is validated or rejected. We ask for each institution and academic centres of human biology & geography, anthropology, archeology, and for linguistics, philologists, phoneticians, and phonologists. We will use these maps produced by you dear colleagues in a synthesis of many diverse Atlases, being a project of collegiate research that we are proposing to you. If the hypothesis is accepted you could publish your part of the Arura Project in the Journal you might choose.
Aim of this Project (and subsequent book)
Are these patterns mere coincidences, or a clue to reaching the first one-rooted languages, long before the theological Babel Tower dispersion and get backs the evolutionary dispersion of languages?
We are not intending to demonstrate any superiority of any language over any other, no, never. We love the diversity of languages, accepting the task of caring for every human life on Earth solving the different languages (cultures) that drive us apart. We make this little effort to gain more respect for every language, not only mainstream vehicles to commerce and economy but preserving even the last indigenous language and its dialects at any isolated valley or island worldwide.
The final result of this Project , should be to give place to a recognizing movement among all cultures and its beautiful languages, by demonstrating, with another set of proofs, the unity of our unique cultural species, Homo sapiens, regardless of our skin or hair biochemical differences, in parallel to linguistic ones.
Methodology of Arura 1.0
To achieve our objectives we will carry out these actions:
i) Comparing different Physical maps at different scales with names of rivers, mountains, valleys, plains, and villages/cities, of varied origins and times.
ii) Looking out for the extant traces of the phonemes ur and ar associated with the more "indigenous, native or aboriginal" culture of the sector map, with the aid of the trained (in geography, history, human evolution) person, without taking in account the toponymy derived of clearly historic colonization processes.
iii) Using maps of regional and sub-continental scales, showing major toponymy and opening the curiosity of future researchers to carry a suitable methodology for minor scale maps studies of subsequent Arura's articles for this project.
Arura 1.0: toponymic phonetical fossils in Homo sapiens prehistoric expansion?
Cover and back cover: Mikel de Elguezabal
First edition: <2028
© Mikel Alberto de Elguezabal Méndez, 2028
Fundación LEA, Calle Palmar, D-12, Riberas, 6101 Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela.
Legal deposit:
ISBN: 978-84-617-0672-3
In a Virtuous Earth Collection
Index
Introduction
Aim of this book
Methodology of Arura 1.0
Methodology of Arura 2.0
First Results in Maps & Sheets
First Conclusions
References
Introduction
As a result of our recurrent observations of physical Earth maps during 3 decades, we have discovered some patterns in the toponymy of rivers, mountains, and inhabited lands that could signify a corroboration of the Homo sapiens spread theories from Africa as the first languages developed and left phonetic traces in their land/river naming, and, representing a hypothesis of one rooted first family of languages that derived, as genes did, during the last 60.000 years (Armitage et al., 2011), until reaching some 5,000 living languages in actual times (Kirchner, ) plus the extinct ones.
That protolanguage could start with vocalic sounds derived from guttural naturally occurring voices in first hominids to communicate and name places and objects.
Probably the first sounds of early humans comes from gestures between a mother-child relationship (Falk, 2004) or derived from sounds of pre-Homo humanoid species like australopithecines (Mukhopadhyay, 2009) and founded today in actual hominines which produce speech-like vocalized sounds as in Theropithecus gelada (Bergman, 2013).
The primary vowel sounds for a, e, i, o, u, in Italian, Spanish or English language, for example only, appear, for us, as a core central common dominium among all languages derived from first primitive Homo sapiens emitted sounds to communicate between and within families and clans.
Here, the reader must make an effort in not to think in any particular living language today, to pose these primary vowel sounds we propose as the root human sounds and the subsequent changes and adaptations that occurred during the spreading and isolation/interexchange of the languages of those first humans in their settlement on Africa, Eurasia, Oceania, and Americas lands, accepting this order of colonization given by the fossil and anthropologic evidence.
Each one of the 5000 languages of today's planet Earth could have vowels derivatives sounds from these proto vowels, and we can assume and use the simple classification of open/closed vowels to distinguish two groups and make more basic yet the origin of human first sounds (and then language, later).
But, why in the French language exist up to 16 vowel sounds? We argue on the history of conformation of this (or any other example) language, with the 5 vowels of Latin-based origin, mixed with Germanic and Celtic languages, all of the Indo-European language family, and certainly with borrows from Basque or Euskera a non-Indo-European language (between the Garonne and Ebro rivers in those times), or probably, even from Hebrew or other Semitic language that shared history during the conformation of France as a modern social entity, all that together, encountered in that land during the development of this (more) Romanic language since 121 before Christ.
As the two fossil phonemes we encountered in maps associated with geographic nomenclature of rivers and lands (plus inhabited places near to) that is proposed in this assay, derive from an open vowel (a) and from a closed vowel (u), we can extend the phonemes to the "sister" vowels in each case (a: e) and (u: i, o). But the common sound that took our attention firstly was the consonant r.
The consonants are speech sounds articulated during complete or partial closure of the vocal tract, and here the diversity of consonant sounds among World languages is greater than for vowels, based on the part of the vocal tract contracted, the duration, the force, the velocity of the sound emitted by the individual, the position of the tongue and many others parameters that we are not considering.
"r" seems to be a primitive sound thought to be derived from guttural screams in first primates, hominines and/or hominids, and we have discovered, empirically, a simple pattern associated maybe to designate placemarks or names as the first protolanguages of the first family branches, spread with the first Homo sapiens that colonized Africa and then other continents. These two types of names refer to two of the elements of nature, water places on one side, and earth (land, soil) places in the other.
We have observed, in a deductive way, the worldwide apparent association of the phoneme "ur" with water places, be the source of a river, the river itself, or an inhabited place near a river or sea; the phoneme "ar" is more associated with earth, lands, soil places, be a valley, a plain, a mountain.
In the proposed Challenge we will try to gather the best information that each institution participating could create with the proposed methodology, the maps locating every toponymic with the fossil phonemes we identify as potentially linked to early human spreading, and then we will see if our hypothesis is validated or rejected. We ask for each institution and academic centres of human biology & geography, anthropology, archeology, and for linguistics, philologists, phoneticians, and phonologists. We will use these maps produced by you dear colleagues in a synthesis of many diverse Atlases, being a project of collegiate research that we are proposing to you. If the hypothesis is accepted you could publish your part of the Arura Project in the Journal you might choose.
Aim of this Project (and subsequent book)
Are these patterns mere coincidences, or a clue to reaching the first one-rooted languages, long before the theological Babel Tower dispersion and get backs the evolutionary dispersion of languages?
We are not intending to demonstrate any superiority of any language over any other, no, never. We love the diversity of languages, accepting the task of caring for every human life on Earth solving the different languages (cultures) that drive us apart. We make this little effort to gain more respect for every language, not only mainstream vehicles to commerce and economy but preserving even the last indigenous language and its dialects at any isolated valley or island worldwide.
The final result of this Project , should be to give place to a recognizing movement among all cultures and its beautiful languages, by demonstrating, with another set of proofs, the unity of our unique cultural species, Homo sapiens, regardless of our skin or hair biochemical differences, in parallel to linguistic ones.
Methodology of Arura 1.0
To achieve our objectives we will carry out these actions:
i) Comparing different Physical maps at different scales with names of rivers, mountains, valleys, plains, and villages/cities, of varied origins and times.
ii) Looking out for the extant traces of the phonemes ur and ar associated with the more "indigenous, native or aboriginal" culture of the sector map, with the aid of the trained (in geography, history, human evolution) person, without taking in account the toponymy derived of clearly historic colonization processes.
iii) Using maps of regional and sub-continental scales, showing major toponymy and opening the curiosity of future researchers to carry a suitable methodology for minor scale maps studies of subsequent Arura's articles for this project.
Elabora una introducción muy buena con objetivos y materiales y métodos de la siguiente entrada a este blog donde propongo una investigación y estudio internacional entre varias centros de acabe de micos de filología lingüística fonética semiótica del lenguaje humano y todas las lenguas extintas y existentes y luego quisiera que pudieras analizar la mayoría de mapas disponibles online para que puedas buscar estos fonemas fósiles que propongo la partícula y la partícula ar en nombres o tofonímicos de montañas ríos ciudades relacionados con valles montañas mares y lagos en escalas de mapas regionales y locales en los cinco continentes al azar para verificar la probabilidad de ocurrencia de estos fonemas fósiles toponimicos en concordancia con el modelo de esparcimiento de la especie humana desde hace cientos de miles de años desde el gobierno de África hacia el sur y el norte de África hacia Europa hacia Asia hacia Australia y hacia América con sus respectivos años de migración comprobada por favor utiliza suficientes referencias bibliográficas de revistas indexadas del área de Lingüística antropología arqueología y libros clásicos sobrevolución humana para darle fuerza a esta parte de la discusión y resultados y vamos a concluir con que apenas estamos haciendo una prueba superficial de esta metodología porque es imposible que una persona pueda acarrear al estudio en poco tiempo de todo la toponimia del planeta Tierra donde han habido seres humanos.
Arura 1.0: toponymic phonetical fossils in Homo sapiens prehistoric expansion?
Cover and back cover: Mikel de Elguezabal
First edition: <2028
© Mikel Alberto de Elguezabal Méndez, 2028
Fundación LEA, Calle Palmar, D-12, Riberas, 6101 Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela.
Legal deposit:
ISBN: 978-84-617-0672-3
In a Virtuous Earth Collection
Index
Introduction
Aim of this book
Methodology of Arura 1.0
Methodology of Arura 2.0
First Results in Maps & Sheets
First Conclusions
References
Introduction
As a result of our recurrent observations of physical Earth maps during 3 decades, we have discovered some patterns in the toponymy of rivers, mountains, and inhabited lands that could signify a corroboration of the Homo sapiens spread theories from Africa as the first languages developed and left phonetic traces in their land/river naming, and, representing a hypothesis of one rooted first family of languages that derived, as genes did, during the last 60.000 years (Armitage et al., 2011), until reaching some 5,000 living languages in actual times (Kirchner, ) plus the extinct ones.
That protolanguage could start with vocalic sounds derived from guttural naturally occurring voices in first hominids to communicate and name places and objects.
Probably the first sounds of early humans comes from gestures between a mother-child relationship (Falk, 2004) or derived from sounds of pre-Homo humanoid species like australopithecines (Mukhopadhyay, 2009) and founded today in actual hominines which produce speech-like vocalized sounds as in Theropithecus gelada (Bergman, 2013).
The primary vowel sounds for a, e, i, o, u, in Italian, Spanish or English language, for example only, appear, for us, as a core central common dominium among all languages derived from first primitive Homo sapiens emitted sounds to communicate between and within families and clans.
Here, the reader must make an effort in not to think in any particular living language today, to pose these primary vowel sounds we propose as the root human sounds and the subsequent changes and adaptations that occurred during the spreading and isolation/interexchange of the languages of those first humans in their settlement on Africa, Eurasia, Oceania, and Americas lands, accepting this order of colonization given by the fossil and anthropologic evidence.
Each one of the 5000 languages of today's planet Earth could have vowels derivatives sounds from these proto vowels, and we can assume and use the simple classification of open/closed vowels to distinguish two groups and make more basic yet the origin of human first sounds (and then language, later).
But, why in the French language exist up to 16 vowel sounds? We argue on the history of conformation of this (or any other example) language, with the 5 vowels of Latin-based origin, mixed with Germanic and Celtic languages, all of the Indo-European language family, and certainly with borrows from Basque or Euskera a non-Indo-European language (between the Garonne and Ebro rivers in those times), or probably, even from Hebrew or other Semitic language that shared history during the conformation of France as a modern social entity, all that together, encountered in that land during the development of this (more) Romanic language since 121 before Christ.
As the two fossil phonemes we encountered in maps associated with geographic nomenclature of rivers and lands (plus inhabited places near to) that is proposed in this assay, derive from an open vowel (a) and from a closed vowel (u), we can extend the phonemes to the "sister" vowels in each case (a: e) and (u: i, o). But the common sound that took our attention firstly was the consonant r.
The consonants are speech sounds articulated during complete or partial closure of the vocal tract, and here the diversity of consonant sounds among World languages is greater than for vowels, based on the part of the vocal tract contracted, the duration, the force, the velocity of the sound emitted by the individual, the position of the tongue and many others parameters that we are not considering.
"r" seems to be a primitive sound thought to be derived from guttural screams in first primates, hominines and/or hominids, and we have discovered, empirically, a simple pattern associated maybe to designate placemarks or names as the first protolanguages of the first family branches, spread with the first Homo sapiens that colonized Africa and then other continents. These two types of names refer to two of the elements of nature, water places on one side, and earth (land, soil) places in the other.
We have observed, in a deductive way, the worldwide apparent association of the phoneme "ur" with water places, be the source of a river, the river itself, or an inhabited place near a river or sea; the phoneme "ar" is more associated with earth, lands, soil places, be a valley, a plain, a mountain.
In the proposed Challenge we will try to gather the best information that each institution participating could create with the proposed methodology, the maps locating every toponymic with the fossil phonemes we identify as potentially linked to early human spreading, and then we will see if our hypothesis is validated or rejected. We ask for each institution and academic centres of human biology & geography, anthropology, archeology, and for linguistics, philologists, phoneticians, and phonologists. We will use these maps produced by you dear colleagues in a synthesis of many diverse Atlases, being a project of collegiate research that we are proposing to you. If the hypothesis is accepted you could publish your part of the Arura Project in the Journal you might choose.
Aim of this Project (and subsequent book)
Are these patterns mere coincidences, or a clue to reaching the first one-rooted languages, long before the theological Babel Tower dispersion and get backs the evolutionary dispersion of languages?
We are not intending to demonstrate any superiority of any language over any other, no, never. We love the diversity of languages, accepting the task of caring for every human life on Earth solving the different languages (cultures) that drive us apart. We make this little effort to gain more respect for every language, not only mainstream vehicles to commerce and economy but preserving even the last indigenous language and its dialects at any isolated valley or island worldwide.
The final result of this Project , should be to give place to a recognizing movement among all cultures and its beautiful languages, by demonstrating, with another set of proofs, the unity of our unique cultural species, Homo sapiens, regardless of our skin or hair biochemical differences, in parallel to linguistic ones.
Methodology of Arura 1.0
To achieve our objectives we will carry out these actions:
i) Comparing different Physical maps at different scales with names of rivers, mountains, valleys, plains, and villages/cities, of varied origins and times.
ii) Looking out for the extant traces of the phonemes ur and ar associated with the more "indigenous, native or aboriginal" culture of the sector map, with the aid of the trained (in geography, history, human evolution) person, without taking in account the toponymy derived of clearly historic colonization processes.
iii) Using maps of regional and sub-continental scales, showing major toponymy and opening the curiosity of future researchers to carry a suitable methodology for minor scale maps studies of subsequent Arura's articles for this project.
Arura 1.0: toponymic phonetical fossils in Homo sapiens prehistoric expansion?
Cover and back cover: Mikel de Elguezabal
First edition: <2028
© Mikel Alberto de Elguezabal Méndez, 2028
Fundación LEA, Calle Palmar, D-12, Riberas, 6101 Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela.
Legal deposit:
ISBN: 978-84-617-0672-3
In a Virtuous Earth Collection
Index
Introduction
Aim of this book
Methodology of Arura 1.0
Methodology of Arura 2.0
First Results in Maps & Sheets
First Conclusions
References
Introduction
As a result of our recurrent observations of physical Earth maps during 3 decades, we have discovered some patterns in the toponymy of rivers, mountains, and inhabited lands that could signify a corroboration of the Homo sapiens spread theories from Africa as the first languages developed and left phonetic traces in their land/river naming, and, representing a hypothesis of one rooted first family of languages that derived, as genes did, during the last 60.000 years (Armitage et al., 2011), until reaching some 5,000 living languages in actual times (Kirchner, ) plus the extinct ones.
That protolanguage could start with vocalic sounds derived from guttural naturally occurring voices in first hominids to communicate and name places and objects.
Probably the first sounds of early humans comes from gestures between a mother-child relationship (Falk, 2004) or derived from sounds of pre-Homo humanoid species like australopithecines (Mukhopadhyay, 2009) and founded today in actual hominines which produce speech-like vocalized sounds as in Theropithecus gelada (Bergman, 2013).
The primary vowel sounds for a, e, i, o, u, in Italian, Spanish or English language, for example only, appear, for us, as a core central common dominium among all languages derived from first primitive Homo sapiens emitted sounds to communicate between and within families and clans.
Here, the reader must make an effort in not to think in any particular living language today, to pose these primary vowel sounds we propose as the root human sounds and the subsequent changes and adaptations that occurred during the spreading and isolation/interexchange of the languages of those first humans in their settlement on Africa, Eurasia, Oceania, and Americas lands, accepting this order of colonization given by the fossil and anthropologic evidence.
Each one of the 5000 languages of today's planet Earth could have vowels derivatives sounds from these proto vowels, and we can assume and use the simple classification of open/closed vowels to distinguish two groups and make more basic yet the origin of human first sounds (and then language, later).
But, why in the French language exist up to 16 vowel sounds? We argue on the history of conformation of this (or any other example) language, with the 5 vowels of Latin-based origin, mixed with Germanic and Celtic languages, all of the Indo-European language family, and certainly with borrows from Basque or Euskera a non-Indo-European language (between the Garonne and Ebro rivers in those times), or probably, even from Hebrew or other Semitic language that shared history during the conformation of France as a modern social entity, all that together, encountered in that land during the development of this (more) Romanic language since 121 before Christ.
As the two fossil phonemes we encountered in maps associated with geographic nomenclature of rivers and lands (plus inhabited places near to) that is proposed in this assay, derive from an open vowel (a) and from a closed vowel (u), we can extend the phonemes to the "sister" vowels in each case (a: e) and (u: i, o). But the common sound that took our attention firstly was the consonant r.
The consonants are speech sounds articulated during complete or partial closure of the vocal tract, and here the diversity of consonant sounds among World languages is greater than for vowels, based on the part of the vocal tract contracted, the duration, the force, the velocity of the sound emitted by the individual, the position of the tongue and many others parameters that we are not considering.
"r" seems to be a primitive sound thought to be derived from guttural screams in first primates, hominines and/or hominids, and we have discovered, empirically, a simple pattern associated maybe to designate placemarks or names as the first protolanguages of the first family branches, spread with the first Homo sapiens that colonized Africa and then other continents. These two types of names refer to two of the elements of nature, water places on one side, and earth (land, soil) places in the other.
We have observed, in a deductive way, the worldwide apparent association of the phoneme "ur" with water places, be the source of a river, the river itself, or an inhabited place near a river or sea; the phoneme "ar" is more associated with earth, lands, soil places, be a valley, a plain, a mountain.
In the proposed Challenge we will try to gather the best information that each institution participating could create with the proposed methodology, the maps locating every toponymic with the fossil phonemes we identify as potentially linked to early human spreading, and then we will see if our hypothesis is validated or rejected. We ask for each institution and academic centres of human biology & geography, anthropology, archeology, and for linguistics, philologists, phoneticians, and phonologists. We will use these maps produced by you dear colleagues in a synthesis of many diverse Atlases, being a project of collegiate research that we are proposing to you. If the hypothesis is accepted you could publish your part of the Arura Project in the Journal you might choose.
Aim of this Project (and subsequent book)
Are these patterns mere coincidences, or a clue to reaching the first one-rooted languages, long before the theological Babel Tower dispersion and get backs the evolutionary dispersion of languages?
We are not intending to demonstrate any superiority of any language over any other, no, never. We love the diversity of languages, accepting the task of caring for every human life on Earth solving the different languages (cultures) that drive us apart. We make this little effort to gain more respect for every language, not only mainstream vehicles to commerce and economy but preserving even the last indigenous language and its dialects at any isolated valley or island worldwide.
The final result of this Project , should be to give place to a recognizing movement among all cultures and its beautiful languages, by demonstrating, with another set of proofs, the unity of our unique cultural species, Homo sapiens, regardless of our skin or hair biochemical differences, in parallel to linguistic ones.
Methodology of Arura 1.0
To achieve our objectives we will carry out these actions:
i) Comparing different Physical maps at different scales with names of rivers, mountains, valleys, plains, and villages/cities, of varied origins and times.
ii) Looking out for the extant traces of the phonemes ur and ar associated with the more "indigenous, native or aboriginal" culture of the sector map, with the aid of the trained (in geography, history, human evolution) person, without taking in account the toponymy derived of clearly historic colonization processes.
iii) Using maps of regional and sub-continental scales, showing major toponymy and opening the curiosity of future researchers to carry a suitable methodology for minor scale maps studies of subsequent Arura's articles for this project.
Arura 1.0: toponymic phonetical fossils in Homo sapiens prehistoric expansion?
Cover and back cover: Mikel de Elguezabal
First edition: <2028
© Mikel Alberto de Elguezabal Méndez, 2028
Fundación LEA, Calle Palmar, D-12, Riberas, 6101 Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela.
Legal deposit:
ISBN: 978-84-617-0672-3
In a Virtuous Earth Collection
Index
Introduction
Aim of this book
Methodology of Arura 1.0
Methodology of Arura 2.0
First Results in Maps & Sheets
First Conclusions
References
Introduction
As a result of our recurrent observations of physical Earth maps during 3 decades, we have discovered some patterns in the toponymy of rivers, mountains, and inhabited lands that could signify a corroboration of the Homo sapiens spread theories from Africa as the first languages developed and left phonetic traces in their land/river naming, and, representing a hypothesis of one rooted first family of languages that derived, as genes did, during the last 60.000 years (Armitage et al., 2011), until reaching some 5,000 living languages in actual times (Kirchner, ) plus the extinct ones.
That protolanguage could start with vocalic sounds derived from guttural naturally occurring voices in first hominids to communicate and name places and objects.
Probably the first sounds of early humans comes from gestures between a mother-child relationship (Falk, 2004) or derived from sounds of pre-Homo humanoid species like australopithecines (Mukhopadhyay, 2009) and founded today in actual hominines which produce speech-like vocalized sounds as in Theropithecus gelada (Bergman, 2013).
The primary vowel sounds for a, e, i, o, u, in Italian, Spanish or English language, for example only, appear, for us, as a core central common dominium among all languages derived from first primitive Homo sapiens emitted sounds to communicate between and within families and clans.
Here, the reader must make an effort in not to think in any particular living language today, to pose these primary vowel sounds we propose as the root human sounds and the subsequent changes and adaptations that occurred during the spreading and isolation/interexchange of the languages of those first humans in their settlement on Africa, Eurasia, Oceania, and Americas lands, accepting this order of colonization given by the fossil and anthropologic evidence.
Each one of the 5000 languages of today's planet Earth could have vowels derivatives sounds from these proto vowels, and we can assume and use the simple classification of open/closed vowels to distinguish two groups and make more basic yet the origin of human first sounds (and then language, later).
But, why in the French language exist up to 16 vowel sounds? We argue on the history of conformation of this (or any other example) language, with the 5 vowels of Latin-based origin, mixed with Germanic and Celtic languages, all of the Indo-European language family, and certainly with borrows from Basque or Euskera a non-Indo-European language (between the Garonne and Ebro rivers in those times), or probably, even from Hebrew or other Semitic language that shared history during the conformation of France as a modern social entity, all that together, encountered in that land during the development of this (more) Romanic language since 121 before Christ.
As the two fossil phonemes we encountered in maps associated with geographic nomenclature of rivers and lands (plus inhabited places near to) that is proposed in this assay, derive from an open vowel (a) and from a closed vowel (u), we can extend the phonemes to the "sister" vowels in each case (a: e) and (u: i, o). But the common sound that took our attention firstly was the consonant r.
The consonants are speech sounds articulated during complete or partial closure of the vocal tract, and here the diversity of consonant sounds among World languages is greater than for vowels, based on the part of the vocal tract contracted, the duration, the force, the velocity of the sound emitted by the individual, the position of the tongue and many others parameters that we are not considering.
"r" seems to be a primitive sound thought to be derived from guttural screams in first primates, hominines and/or hominids, and we have discovered, empirically, a simple pattern associated maybe to designate placemarks or names as the first protolanguages of the first family branches, spread with the first Homo sapiens that colonized Africa and then other continents. These two types of names refer to two of the elements of nature, water places on one side, and earth (land, soil) places in the other.
We have observed, in a deductive way, the worldwide apparent association of the phoneme "ur" with water places, be the source of a river, the river itself, or an inhabited place near a river or sea; the phoneme "ar" is more associated with earth, lands, soil places, be a valley, a plain, a mountain.
In the proposed Challenge we will try to gather the best information that each institution participating could create with the proposed methodology, the maps locating every toponymic with the fossil phonemes we identify as potentially linked to early human spreading, and then we will see if our hypothesis is validated or rejected. We ask for each institution and academic centres of human biology & geography, anthropology, archeology, and for linguistics, philologists, phoneticians, and phonologists. We will use these maps produced by you dear colleagues in a synthesis of many diverse Atlases, being a project of collegiate research that we are proposing to you. If the hypothesis is accepted you could publish your part of the Arura Project in the Journal you might choose.
Aim of this Project (and subsequent book)
Are these patterns mere coincidences, or a clue to reaching the first one-rooted languages, long before the theological Babel Tower dispersion and get backs the evolutionary dispersion of languages?
We are not intending to demonstrate any superiority of any language over any other, no, never. We love the diversity of languages, accepting the task of caring for every human life on Earth solving the different languages (cultures) that drive us apart. We make this little effort to gain more respect for every language, not only mainstream vehicles to commerce and economy but preserving even the last indigenous language and its dialects at any isolated valley or island worldwide.
The final result of this Project , should be to give place to a recognizing movement among all cultures and its beautiful languages, by demonstrating, with another set of proofs, the unity of our unique cultural species, Homo sapiens, regardless of our skin or hair biochemical differences, in parallel to linguistic ones.
Methodology of Arura 1.0
To achieve our objectives we will carry out these actions:
i) Comparing different Physical maps at different scales with names of rivers, mountains, valleys, plains, and villages/cities, of varied origins and times.
ii) Looking out for the extant traces of the phonemes ur and ar associated with the more "indigenous, native or aboriginal" culture of the sector map, with the aid of the trained (in geography, history, human evolution) person, without taking in account the toponymy derived of clearly historic colonization processes.
iii) Using maps of regional and sub-continental scales, showing major toponymy and opening the curiosity of future researchers to carry a suitable methodology for minor scale maps studies of subsequent Arura's articles for this project.
Arura 1.0: toponymic phonetical fossils in Homo
sapiens prehistoric expansion?
Cover and back cover:
Mikel de Elguezabal
First edition: <2028
© Mikel Alberto de Elguezabal Méndez, 2028
Fundación LEA, Calle Palmar, D-12, Riberas, 6101
Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela.
Legal deposit:
ISBN: 978-84-617-0672-3
In a Virtuous Earth Collection
Index
Introduction
Aim of this
book
Methodology of
Arura 1.0
Methodology of
Arura 2.0
First Results
in Maps & Sheets
First
Conclusions
References
As a result of our recurrent observations
of physical Earth maps during 3 decades, we have discovered some patterns in the
toponymy of rivers, mountains, and inhabited lands that could signify a
corroboration of the Homo sapiens spread theories from Africa as the
first languages developed and left phonetic traces in their land/river naming,
and, representing a hypothesis of one rooted first family of languages that
derived, as genes did, during the last 60.000 years (Armitage et al.,
2011), until reaching some 5,000 living languages in actual times (Kirchner, )
plus the extinct ones.
That protolanguage could start with
vocalic sounds derived from guttural naturally occurring voices in first hominids
to communicate and name places and objects.
Probably the first sounds of early
humans comes from gestures between a mother-child relationship (Falk, 2004) or
derived from sounds of pre-Homo humanoid species like australopithecines (Mukhopadhyay,
2009) and founded today in actual hominines which produce speech-like vocalized
sounds as in Theropithecus gelada (Bergman, 2013).
The primary vowel sounds for a, e, i, o, u,
in Italian, Spanish or English language, for example only, appear, for us, as
a core central common dominium among all languages derived from first primitive
Homo sapiens emitted sounds to communicate
between and within families and clans.
Here, the reader must make an effort in
not to think in any particular living language today, to pose these primary vowel
sounds we propose as the root human sounds and the subsequent changes and
adaptations that occurred during the spreading and isolation/interexchange of the
languages of those first humans in their settlement on Africa, Eurasia, Oceania, and Americas lands, accepting this order of colonization given by the fossil and
anthropologic evidence.
Each one of the 5000 languages of today's
planet Earth could have vowels derivatives sounds from these proto vowels, and
we can assume and use the simple classification of open/closed vowels to
distinguish two groups and make more basic yet the origin of human first sounds
(and then language, later).
But, why in the French language exist up to 16 vowel
sounds? We argue on the history of conformation of this (or any other example)
language, with the 5 vowels of Latin-based origin, mixed with Germanic and
Celtic languages, all of the Indo-European language family, and certainly with
borrows from Basque or Euskera a non-Indo-European language (between the
Garonne and Ebro rivers in those times), or probably, even from Hebrew or other
Semitic language that shared history during the conformation of France as a
modern social entity, all that together, encountered in that land during the
development of this (more) Romanic language since 121 before Christ.
As the two fossil phonemes we encountered
in maps associated with geographic nomenclature of rivers and lands (plus inhabited
places near to) that is proposed in this assay, derive from an open vowel (a)
and from a closed vowel (u), we can extend the phonemes to the
"sister" vowels in each case (a: e) and (u: i, o). But
the common sound that took our attention firstly was the consonant r.
The consonants are speech sounds
articulated during complete or partial closure of the vocal tract,
and here the diversity of consonant sounds among World languages is greater
than for vowels, based on the part of the vocal tract contracted, the duration,
the force, the velocity of the sound emitted by the individual, the position of the tongue and many others parameters that we are not considering.
"r" seems to be a primitive sound thought to
be derived from guttural screams in first primates, hominines and/or hominids,
and we have discovered, empirically, a simple pattern associated maybe to designate
placemarks or names as the first protolanguages of the first family branches,
spread with the first Homo sapiens that colonized Africa and then other
continents. These two types of names refer to two of the elements of nature, water
places on one side, and earth (land, soil) places in the other.
We have observed, in a deductive way, the worldwide apparent association
of the phoneme "ur" with water places, be the source of a
river, the river itself, or an inhabited place near a river or sea; the phoneme
"ar" is more associated with earth, lands, soil places, be a
valley, a plain, a mountain.
In the proposed Challenge we will try to gather the best information that each institution participating could create with the proposed methodology, the maps locating every toponymic with the fossil phonemes we identify as potentially linked to early human spreading, and then we will see if our hypothesis is validated or rejected. We ask for each institution and academic centres of human biology &
geography, anthropology, archeology, and for linguistics, philologists,
phoneticians, and phonologists. We will use these maps produced by you dear colleagues in a synthesis of many diverse Atlases,
being a project of collegiate
research that we are proposing to you. If the hypothesis is accepted you could publish your part of the Arura Project in the Journal you might choose.
Aim of this Project (and subsequent book)
Are these
patterns mere coincidences, or a clue to reaching the first one-rooted languages,
long before the theological Babel Tower dispersion and get backs the
evolutionary dispersion of languages?
We are not
intending to demonstrate any superiority of any language over any other, no,
never. We love the diversity of languages, accepting the task of caring for every human life
on Earth solving the different languages (cultures) that drive us apart. We
make this little effort to gain more respect for every language, not only
mainstream vehicles to commerce and economy but preserving even the last
indigenous language and its dialects at any isolated valley or island
worldwide.
The final result of this Project , should be to give place to a recognizing movement among all cultures and its
beautiful languages, by demonstrating, with another set of proofs, the unity of
our unique cultural species, Homo sapiens, regardless of our skin or
hair biochemical differences, in parallel to linguistic ones.
To achieve our
objectives we will carry out these actions:
i) Comparing
different Physical maps at different scales with names of rivers, mountains,
valleys, plains, and villages/cities, of varied origins and times.
iii) Using maps
of regional and sub-continental scales, showing major toponymy and opening the
curiosity of future researchers to carry a suitable methodology for minor scale
maps studies of subsequent Arura's articles for this project.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario